The verification layer for grant funding

Your grant pipeline looks full. The funding still feels less certain than it should.

Here is the math on a $300,000 grant goal.

Your mission needs$300,000
Your pipeline says$1,200,000
Documented path to funding$95,000
0.32xverified
coverage

A full-looking pipeline, and only a fraction with a real path. That gap is the part no one has shown you.

Illustrative. Your own numbers are computed when you run the free Funding Path Checkup.

Every verdict is built from documented funder behavior, eligibility criteria, award history, and primary-source 990 records. Not AI guesses.

Run the free Funding Path Checkup Free. No signup. About five minutes.

Where to start

Find the gap while there is still time to close it.

Your mission already has commitments attached to it: programs, staff, communities, promises made to your board. By the time the gap between those promises and what your pipeline can fund is obvious, the year is usually over. The free Funding Path Checkup shows it in five minutes. No account, nothing leaves your browser.

  1. 1Tell it your grant goal and your win rate.
  2. 2Tell it how many grants and funders you have in motion.
  3. 3See what a pipeline your size typically needs, against what you have.
  4. 4Get a verdict: is the pipeline strong enough, and is the shortfall grants or funders?

The Checkup measures the size and shape of your pipeline. The Verified Pipeline reviews the grants inside it: a verdict on each, with stronger opportunities to replace the ones that do not belong.

What a verdict looks like

Here is one of those verdicts, on a real grant.

This is what builds a verified pipeline. Two real verdicts: one to pursue, one to walk away from.

Sharke / Decision Record
Community Resilience Fund
Family foundation · $150K to $250K · Southwest
Verdict
Verified fit
Pursue.
1Repeatedly funds organizations exactly like yours
12 of the last 15 awards went to rural youth mental health organizations with budgets of $300K to $600K, in the Southwest. Your size, your geography, your issue.
Source: 990-PF Schedule I, 2021 to 2025
2Recent, open, and open to you
Funded 4 first-time grantees in the last 2 cycles. The next cycle is open now, and eligibility and geography are verified compatible.
Source: published guidelines, recent award recipients
Documented path. Worth your team's hours.
Sharke / Decision Record
Community Health Fund
2026 cycle · budget floor in effect
Verdict
Strategic mismatch
Move on.
Redirect those 20 to 30 hours to better-fit opportunities Sharke surfaces in its place, like the Rural Health Innovation Fund and the Southwest Youth Wellness Grant.
1Award history favors much larger budgets
Of the last 20 grants (2021 to 2025), 18 went to organizations with budgets above $2M. This org's budget is $410K.
Source: 990-PF Schedule I, 2021 to 2025
2No new grantees
No first-time grantee funded in the last 4 cycles.
Source: 990-PF Schedule I, award recipients
3Geography
Zero awards in this org's state across 5 years.
Source: 990-PF Schedule I, recipient locations
Rests on strong data (5 years of filings). The verdict comes with the better-fit grants and funder relationships those 20 to 30 hours should go to instead.

A verdict is categorical, never a percentage and never an A grade. The Move on record above is the kind a team can forward straight to a board.

"I've been around grants long enough to know that not every opportunity is worth pursuing, but we usually don't find that out until we're already deep into the work. The review helped us take a harder look at what was actually realistic and where we should focus our limited time. That alone made it worthwhile."

Director of Development · Workforce development nonprofit · $1.2M annual budget

What that gap is

Paper coverage versus verified coverage.

Paper coverage is every grant you are tracking. Verified coverage is how much of it has a documented path to funding. The drop between the two is the number that actually decides your year.

verified coverage = verified pipeline value / your grant-revenue gap
In plain terms: does your pipeline hold enough verified opportunity to reach your funding goal?

It is not a fit score and never a win promise. It is an honest range that names what it cannot see, such as a board champion or a priority shift not yet public.

The point is not learning where the gap is. It is seeing exactly what closes it.

The pipeline you have

An unverified pipeline contains grants with no documented path to funding, and you cannot tell which ones.

Every one of these starts the same way: "We thought it was a fit."

Discovered the disqualifier after submission.
AI surfaced a grant that was never viable.
Repeated rejection, with no explanation.
Uncertainty about where the hours belong.
70%+
of grant applications are rejected
Source: GrantWatch (2025). Foundations fund 15 to 30% of applications.
25 hrs
average staff time per foundation application
Federal grants run 50+ hours. Source: Professional Grant Writer.

Most rejected applications fail before a reviewer reads them: an eligibility gate, the funder's award history, cycle status, a relationship the team never had.

The grants that fund are the only ones that produce cash. The rest consumed the hours that would have produced cash somewhere else. Both halves of that stay invisible until the year is gone.

A board can understand a documented path. It cannot understand why staff spent 25 hours on a grant that never had a path to funding.

"We knew we needed more funding. What we didn't know was whether the grants we were counting on were actually going to get us there. Looking at them one by one changed my confidence level pretty quickly. A few weren't nearly as strong as we thought, and I'd rather know that before my team spends another month chasing them."

Executive Director · Texas youth mental health nonprofit · $950K annual budget
Run the free Funding Path Checkup Free. No signup. About five minutes.

Why AI does not close the gap

AI raises the number you can see. It cannot raise the number that funds you.

Most grant search
adds to the pile.
Sharke
tells you which of the pile has a path.

AI matches on topic, not on whether you qualify. When it cannot find something, it fills the blank instead of flagging the gap. Four ways that shows up in a real pipeline:

Ghost deadlines

AI surfaces a grant from 2023 and presents it as current. The deadline belongs to a cycle that closed two years ago.

The vibe match

Your nonprofit does after-school coding. A foundation funds youth technology. AI calls it a 95% match. What it missed: a $5M minimum budget, one county only.

Open mission, closed process

The website says they support hunger relief, so AI says apply. The 990 shows no new grantee in six years.

Invented priorities

It is the Smith Arts Foundation, so AI assumes they fund all arts. The reality: Baroque opera in New Jersey.

The hard part of grant work is not the writing. It is knowing which grants to walk away from, and which ones are worth your team's hours, before those hours go in.

How verified coverage works

Measure the gap. Rule every grant in or out. Then fill the gap with grants that have a path, and keep that number current.

Step 01 / Measure

How much verified pipeline you actually need

Your funding goal is your number. Sharke shows how much verified pipeline it realistically takes to reach it, based on how grants are actually awarded to organizations like yours. A range, never a fixed promise.

You see your verified coverage.
Step 02 / Verify

A Decision Record on every grant

Source-cited across eligibility, funder behavior, timing, and relationship requirements. Categorical, never a score. The grants with no path leave the list before staff time goes in.

You get a Pursue, Wait, or Move on verdict, source-cited.
Step 03 / Fill

Close the gap with grants that have a path

Sharke surfaces better-fit grants you may not be tracking, each one carrying a verdict, so you add only grants with a documented path to funding.

You fill the gap with grants worth the hours.
Step 04 / Maintain

Keep the number current

As cycles turn and funder priorities shift, your coverage stays live. Sharke also surfaces the relationships worth building now, including invite-only funders, so next cycle does not start from zero.

Your number stays current, and you build toward funders you cannot apply to cold.

Two things move your coverage: the grants worth pursuing, and the funder relationships worth building now. Sharke tracks both and keeps the number current. That is the Verified Pipeline.

Who built Sharke

Collin Brown has spent his career building ways to measure things people thought could only be judged by intuition. In mergers and acquisitions, his framework for measuring acquisitiveness helped companies distinguish between deals that created value and deals that destroyed it. The work is still cited in M&A research today.

In grant-seeking, he saw the same problem: organizations were making major funding decisions without a way to measure whether their pipeline had a path to the funding they needed.

Verified coverage is that measurement.

He has secured grants from NIH, NSF, private foundations, and $1M+ federal awards across corporate, university, startup, and nonprofit work, including time as a nonprofit Executive Director. Wharton MBA. Trained at Duke Sanford School of Public Policy. Author of "AI You Can Actually Trust" (Amazon Top 50 Business Bestseller).

Selected for the 2026 NVIDIA Inception Program

Find your path

Sharke runs differently depending on how you work with grants.

Executive directors & nonprofit leaders

You know what your mission costs. You have never seen whether your grant pipeline can fund it.

See your verified coverage and the grants that close the gap.

Run the free Funding Path Checkup
Grant writers & consultants

The Decision Record is the trail that makes the call defensible before a client commits the time.

Run one client grant. Decision back in 24 hours.

Run one client grant
Foundations & capacity builders

At the next board review you will be asked what your capacity dollars produced. Right now the honest answer is "we ran a workshop."

Make verification the standard across your portfolio.

See how this fits your portfolio

The hours are already being spent. The only question is whether they are going to the right grants.

See whether your pipeline can actually reach your funding goal, before the year decides for you.

Run the free Funding Path Checkup

Free. No signup. About five minutes.

Free. About five minutes. Run the Funding Path Checkup